odd tech question

[Rob Lang]

Instead you could just not justify it and say IT IS, OK? You're not actually going to try and build this computer, are you?

[Groffa]

I agree with Dr. Beard. You had me interested at the first post, kumakami!

[BubbaBrown]

I don't think more channels is going to solve the problem. What you have is a lack of finesse. You might want to take a look at the early modem standards and how they encoded data. There is a band called Information Society that used to record a 300 baud, 8, N, 1 terminal transmission of secret messages that you could play back to a modem in wait mode to decode. Also for a more modern example of tackling data transmission over audio frequencies, take a look at HAM Radio. There's a tool call fldigi that serves as a software emulated data modem for HAM use.

http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html

You can play around with this by setting up two computers in the room with the software and a speaker/microphone combination.

[kumakami]

Rob think of this as Hard Sci-fantisy, I have to get the (false) physics right or it wont make sense.....

[kumakami]

I just like taking silly ideas and being realistic about them...so do neuro-scientists http://vimeo.com/19716014

[kumakami]

ok so if we can assume that faster read speed was there answer... then 548,640 millimeter per second is 1.097280 MHz. For those who do not trancelate metric well thats 1800feet a sec. or 21,600 inchs a sec.

thats not as bad as I would have guessed. not even close to a mile and hour speed. hmmmmmm.